Many people I’ve spoken to seem to think that they don’t have anything to hide, and as long as the government isn’t listening in on the actual phone conversations, then they’re fine with it. As you might guess, I’m not. This slide from 30th Chaos Communication Congress (30C3) hits the head on the nail.
I honestly don’t understand why this wasn’t more publicized. It is great news! UN votes to protect privacy in digital age (from Associated Press)
Fantastic! Only real good news about this whole NSA scandal I’ve heard in a long time.
So, James Clapper, US Director of national Intelligence, lies to Congress. First he calls the lie the “least untruthful” answer he could publicly provide, and then cites a momentary memory failure. Seven congressmen take issue with James Clapper’s testimony, but Obama administration unlikely to turn against director.
Let me recap: James Clapper, a retired lieutenant general in the United States Air Force (you’d think he knows right from wrong, truth from lie), lies under oath to US Congress and it is not likely to have any consequences for him.
Initially I’m astounded, but after a while, I’m sadly less surprised.
What kind of a message does that send?
If guys like him lie willfully under oath, how does that say about their credibility when not under oath?